![]() |
Patrick, Sam and Charlie try to survive high school. |
Adolescence is a terribly awkward time of life. We’re smart
enough to know a few things, but so emotionally immature and insecure to do
much about them. Visceral trumps cerebral, every time. The filmmakers behind
“The Perks of Being a Wallflower” understand this well. They accurately portray
this confusing stage, when impulsiveness and misunderstood neuroses can, at any
given second, make the most-recent emotion feel like the most-powerful moment
in our lives.
“Wallflower” (directed by Stephen Chbosky; based on his
book) centers on Charlie (the particularly effective Logan Lerman), an earnest
and likeable kid from the affluent Pittsburgh suburbs. Sweet and unassuming,
Charlie’s soon to be a freshman in high school. Significant problems from his
past are hinted at, but not initially explained. His older brother’s gone off
to play football at Penn State. His only-slightly older sister is dating a guy
who’s physically abusive, even though he sports traditional hippy signifiers
(ponytail, dashiki sweaters, Birkenstocks), and is president of the school’s
earth club.
With few friends, and fearful he’ll likely be the target of
hazing, Charlie dreads the transition from middle- to high school. In fact, he
regards his remaining four years of school like a sentence, going so far as
counting the days til he’s free.
That is until his chance meeting with Patrick (Ezra Miller,
particularly menacing as the title character, in “We Have to Talk About
Kevin”), and Sam (“Harry Potter’s” Emma Watson) at a football game. Patrick
recognizes Charlie from shop class, and invites him to a party. Charlie’s
surprised, but accepts. Seemingly, this is the first time a classmate has ever
reached out to befriend him.
Charlie is fascinated, and pleasantly surprised, to find
fellow students who drink, use drugs, and are interested in literature, art,
film, and music. They don’t pick on, or reject him. He revels in their
acceptance.
More than all that, he’s enchanted by Sam, the
beautiful-but-obviously-damaged older girl, who embodies hope and possibility.
Believing she seems him as “just a friend,” he admires her from up close, but
is afraid to act on his feelings. As the film states eloquently, we only pursue
the love we feel we deserve.
The action of the movie is fairly predictable. We follow the
clique as they grow closer, suffering through the inevitable growing pains of
teenage years: Their romances, break-ups, drug and alcohol use, and individual
self-discoveries impart life lessons. They endure high-school dances, have
parties, hook up, and occasionally fight. But mostly they talk, and enjoy each
other’s company. Over time, tucked safely within the nurturing embrace of this
tight circle of close friends, Charlie begins to grow, and come into his own.
He develops confidence, and starts to form his own voice.
But what to do about Sam?
I enjoyed “Wallflower,” though it isn’t without problems.
While not out-of-place within the context of the film, it’s hard to imagine
real-world kids possessing this level of self-awareness, insight, confidence
and wisdom. For all their struggles, most of these kids seem fairly
well-adjusted, most of the time. Also, by showing problems unique to
adolescence, it sometimes veers into melodrama, as well. Which is OK, I
suppose. Adolescents are the movie’s primary target-audience, and they’re often
given to fits overly dramatic. This flaw isn’t fatal. Finally, the parents are
barely around (believable enough, from my experience). However, when they are,
they’re shown as mostly stuffy, and out-of-touch. (Paul Rudd’s sympathetic
English teacher is the exception. He sees something in Charlie, and tries to
nurture that spark).
There’s also a development late in the film (which I won’t
divulge here), that I found unnecessary. It didn’t add to the story, or my
understanding of its characters. It felt out of place, contrived, and needless.
Still, Lerner’s performance as the shy, insecure Charlie is
convincing. His gentle expression and calm demeanor elicit sympathy and compassion,
from us as well as his film friends. Smart, reflective, selfless, and kind, we
root for him to overcome the personal demons of his experience.
“Wallflower” owes much to the early John Hughes films, such
as “Sixteen Candles,” and “The Breakfast Club,” as well as “Dead Poet’s
Society.” Like those films, it takes its teenagers seriously. It sees them as
thoughtful, sensitive, 3-dimensional people, rather than caricatures. It also
similarly uses music to create mood and tone. Finally, it covers much of the
same “coming-of-age” ground, where a hurtful word can lead to a torturous
crisis, and the perceived promise contained in the smile of a pretty girl can
make your day.
I liked this film very much, but stopped just short of
loving it. I did, however, love its music: David Bowie, the Smiths, New Order,
Badly Drawn Boy. Mostly this is the music of my own youth, in the late 1980s
(which made me wonder in what time period exactly the film was supposed to take
place). “Wallflower,” and its melodic stroll down Memory Blvd, made me think
about my own youth, smile and then hum.
No comments:
Post a Comment